Posted by
Cristy Li on Monday, August 27, 2007 2:02:47 AM
On the 24 Aug. 2007 the "Reverend" Jim Sutter published an article at his Site Hatewatch Hall of Shame entitled "Do We Need The Stupid Awards" in which he made some very serious and factually inaccurate allegations in which he wrote, "...the former law clerk who sent me an e-mail making a quid pro quo threat that meets every single element of the felony crime of extortion and putting it into writing."
On or about on the 09 Aug. 2007 Sutter published other inaccuracies about me claiming, "...she writes for Townhall...one of the other identified hate sites and has her own blog at: http://cristyli.blogspot.com/ which has many bigoted, anti-Muslim articles using the same lies as Spencer, Johnson...Ohio State University confirms that Ms. Li is of Columbus, Ohio 43201, is a student at Fisher College of Business, majoring in marketing and training to write magazine advertisements."
On the 23 Aug. 2007 I did in-fact send to "Reverend" Jim Sutter a correspondence in reply to a letter from Sutter earlier in the day in which Sutter wrote, "...As for my post about you-I offer you the same opportunity I offer everyone else listed in the Blog (Hatewatch Hall of Shame) If you can provide factual information showing that I had made a mistake, I would be glad to correct any such mistake. For instance, you said you were a law clerk...if you can provide information to verify this, and you are not the person I identified from OSU, then I would make the appropriate changes..."
In my letter to Sutter I wrote: Dear Mr. Suter:
This reconfirms receipt of your letter as above referenced, I have appended a courtesy copy of it hereto for your convenience.
I have in-fact reviewed the record of the proceedings ( referring to United States of America v. Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development, et. al. Case No. CR 3:04-CR 240 G USDC, Dallas Texas) and I have read what the Defendant said and what the Judge had said subsequently. The facts are not in dispute.
I have carefully reviewed the paper by Glenn Reinsford, ( Who CAIRS About Jim Sutter ?) and the evidence which supports the document, likewise I have reviewed other documents including but not limited to public records from the USDC, Cleveland (see, United States of America v. Jim Sutter, Case No. 1:94-CR-00010-SHB-1) and I have determined that the facts speak for themselves.
It is not my intentions on providing you with any documents in order to disprove your delusions about me. What you wrote was in-fact untrue. Cease and Desist from making future statements which you can not support. Likewise I would request that you remove the statements made or in the alternative print a retraction acknowledging what you wrote was in-correct, making a public apology and refrain from this behavior in the future.
By your own admissions, you acknowledge that you have not verified anything which you wrote. Your the individual that has made unsupported claims, the burden is upon you to prove what you claimed was accurate (which it is not) I am not under any obligation either legally or morally to prove that what you have written is untrue.
I believe that you would benefit from obtaining the advice of an Attorney and I would encourage you to contact your local bar association for Attorneys in your area should you not have one.
Thank you very much.
Sincerely,
The "Reverend" Jim Sutter lied again. There is no Extortion. Sutter victimizes people, makes up allegations and then the "Reverend" Jim Sutter expects people to produce evidence to disprove what he wrote.